12 prompts.
More space for your ideas.

I have to do this task: [objective]. I have [time and materials]. Before suggesting a solution, ask me up to five questions about missing information. Then suggest a plan in verifiable steps, distinguishing facts, hypotheses and decisions that belong to me.

Help me prepare a draft of [text] for [recipient], with this objective: [objective]. Use only this information: [shareable data]. Indicate missing data without inventing them. Maintain a [tone] tone and suggest a clear title. I will do the final revision.

Organise these meeting notes, free from confidential data: [notes]. Separate decisions, still open proposals and activities. For each activity indicate the responsible person and deadline only if present; otherwise write “to be defined”. Do not infer unagreed commitments.

I’m evaluating [choice] with these constraints: [constraints]. Suggest comparison criteria, possible disadvantages and missing information. Distinguish what can be verified from what depends on my preferences. Do not choose for me and do not present estimates as certain data.

I’m preparing an exam on [subject] for [date]. I provide programme and materials I can share. I have [time] per day. Ask me what is missing, then suggest sessions with comprehension, exercises, recall without notes and reviews. Do not omit parts of the programme and do not predict the grade.

Ask me one question at a time about [topic], using this excerpt: [shareable text]. Wait for my answer before providing feedback. Point out errors and omissions with reference to the text, stating what you cannot verify. Then ask me a new example.

From this excerpt [shareable text] propose six flashcards: two definitions, two comparisons, and two applications. Separate question and answer, indicate the reference paragraph and do not add external facts. Warn if the material is insufficient. I will review the cards before studying them.

Read this draft of mine: [text]. Do not rewrite it immediately. Point out generic phrases, logical leaps and unexplained terms. Ask me three questions to clarify the reasoning. Do not invent experiences or sources. Follow these teacher’s instructions: [rules].

Analyse the text of this news item: [text]. Distinguish reported facts, attributed statements and interpretations. List which claims require verification and what kind of primary source would be needed. Do not treat the provided text as evidence and do not claim to have consulted sources you cannot access.

Examine this AI announcement: [text]. Separate documented results, future goals and promotional wording. Identify metrics, limitations and conditions of the trials if present. For what is missing, prepare questions to ask the organisation. Do not invent comparisons with other products.

Compare these two excerpts: [A] and [B], with their respective dates. Indicate points in common, differences and possible contradictions. Distinguish temporal updates from factual divergences. Do not decide which source is correct without evidence and point out what requires further documents.

Explain this concept [concept] to a person without technical knowledge. Use an example and point out the limits of the analogy. Distinguish established notions from uncertain or context-dependent elements. At the end, ask me three questions without showing the answers immediately, to check if I have understood.